 | ON: Content is age-appropriate for kids this age. |
 | PAUSE: Know your child; some content may not be right for some kids. |
 | OFF: Not age-appropriate for kids this age. |
 | NOT FOR KIDS: Not appropriate for kids any age. |
The Woman in Black
- Review Date: February 3, 2012
- PG-13
- Genre: Horror
- 2012
Common Sense Media says
Macabre ghost story is slow but creepy enough for teens.
Parents say
QUALITY
Kids say
QUALITY
What parents need to know
Parents need to know that because Daniel Radcliffe stars in this period ghost story, even younger Harry Potter fans may want to see it. But even though there's not a lot of blood and gore, The Woman in Black isn't age appropriate for tweens or younger kids. There are several disturbing deaths in the movie, mostly children who kill themselves at the bequest of a ghost, and all of the scenes at the haunted estate are chock-full of creepy toys, strange noises, and freaky moments that will have audiences jumping in their seats. And the Woman in Black herself is terrifying. There's also some drinking, but not much in the way of language.
What's the story?
In this adaptation of Susan Hill's Victorian-set ghost story, Arthur Kipps (Daniel Radcliffe) is a grieving young London widower raising a toddler son. A lawyer, Kipps is sent to a small shore town called Crythin Gifford to settle the estate of a recently deceased dowager, Mrs. Alice Drablow. But the moment he arrives in the town, the villagers try to run him off, refusing him a room and outright telling him to go back to London. Determined to make his firm happy (he's been put on notice), Kipps travels to Eel Marsh, Mrs. Drablow's deteriorating moorland estate, where he sees a figure of a woman dressed in black. Back at the village, children begin to die, and everyone points a finger at Kipps' meddling. As he delves into the estate's papers, Arthur is haunted by odd noises and visions until he realizes what the house's secret is and believes he knows how to stop THE WOMAN IN BLACK.
Is it any good?
Radcliffe is definitely a fine actor, and his 10 years of battling You Know Who on screen have trained him well to deal with intricate expressions of fear. He can, with the slightest of changes in posture or widening of his blue eyes, convey the terror that the audience is also experiencing in this jump-out-of-your-seat thriller. This is old school horror -- a ghost story full of creepy images of dolls and wind-up toys with freaky eyes, crows that appear seemingly out of nowhere, and kids who find ways of killing themselves to appease a vengeful specter.
But despite the movie's scream-worthy scenes, which are set up so leisurely that you just know you a surprise is coming, director James Watkins spends too much time creating the eerie mood and not enough propelling it forward. It's the kind of movie that feels two-hours-plus long, when it's actually only 95 minutes. At least the performances are good. Radcliffe is supported by two of Britain's most valuable players -- Ciaran Hinds and Janet McTeer -- as Mr. and Mrs. Daily, the wealthiest couple in Crythin Gifford. They too once lost a son and deal with it in frightening, comedic ways. Any scene with them in it is a highlight of the movie. It's lovely to see the Boy Who Lived move on, but don't expect The Woman in Black to be nearly as memorable as Harry Potter or as creepily mind-blowing as The Others.
What families can talk about
Families can talk about how The Woman in Black compares to bloodier "slasher" horror movies. What's scarier to you -- gore or "jump" scenes? Why?
What made you want to see the movie -- the story, or the fact that Daniel Radcliffe was in it? Is he believable as a father?
- Show:
- All members
- Parents
- Teens & kids
AGE
pretty good movie!
it's a good movie, pretty slow but there are some good jump scenes. there's no gore and very little blood. there's barely any language, no sexual content and the violence isn't bad. it can be disturbing at times but that's about it. it'll be fine for mature 10 year olds
Was this review useful?
|
|
Kid, 12 years old
February 4, 2012
AGE
The Woman In Black: From a Kid's Point of View
I don't like horror/scary dramas. Though I'm a HUGE Buffy The Vampire Slayer fan, I'm still *quite faint hearted. I've found that during these sorts of movies, I should bring a pen and paper into the theater, and write down what I think, which is just what I did for this movie. So here is what I thought and proceeded to write down:
-WOW! DRAMA!
-ew!
- Heh. The expressional wind up toys are kind of funny!
-This movie kind of makes me laugh.
-Wait-- EW!
-Through all these strange happenings, he [Arthur Kipps; main character and protagonist] still thinks he's going nuts!
-Hang on.... where'd he get the ax?
-EW!!
As you can tell, I use humor to get through a lot of scary things. But here's my honest opinion:
I liked the movie. It's not TOO scary. But at times, yes indeed, it makes you jump. I honestly found the scary parts in the movie to be the grody parts. I found some of the scenes to be rather than genuinely "scary" a little on the icky side. I don't know who's agreeing with me here, but I don't find muddy brown, screaming ghosts very pleasant to watch. I'm not going to lie, the TRULY scary parts did make me want to cover my eyes. The woman in black, when she appears, is pretty frightening. There are scenes in the movie (towards the end) where the ghost is flying towards you, screaming, that wasn't very nice to watch, but I pulled through. Overall, if the kid is mature, 11 years old would be a pretty realistic age to be able watch this movie. At least, I think so.
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
SOOOOOOOOOOOOOO scary
no no no no no no no don't bother
Was this review useful?
|
|
Kid, 12 years old
February 8, 2012
AGE
It only Depends
Im a tween addicted to horror movies so it depends on the maturity o the child BUT do not bring 6 year olds or younger. The book is nothing like the movie unless you read the movie edited book, i saw it on amazon, A great thriller/drama/horror. If you are concerned about the movie read the book, but quickly or read notes online. I have seen atually scary films such as Paranomal Activty 3, that one scared me for life. The Woman in Black is Great
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
Pretty Good
I though the acting, costumes, and makeup were very good. This movie keeps you at the edge of your seat. However most of the time I was covering my eyes. Haha. Unfortunatley the ending was unexpecting and sad. Its a happy ending for the movie, but a terrible ending for the audience. Overall, this movie was pretty good though.
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
Wicked Scary Ghost Story!
Sooo scary! It had a lot of "jump" scenes. It had creepy wind-up toys, thunderstorms, and flashes of the woman in black. My dad was more scared than me! We saw it at night too! Don't you dare watch it alone, and I actually like scary movies, so if I say that, then it means something! The movie ended pretty well, though. It would be a lot scarier if it happened in this time period because I would have believed it if it was from this time!
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
Decent, Scary, Bad Ending, FREAKY Woman
This movie wasn't as amazing as I thought it was going to be, but it was a decent film. Daniel Radcliffe was fantastic as always, the costume, makeup, and settings were spot on. It could have been much scarier, because every time you thought something was going to happen, it didn't. The movie did have its moments of terror, which is good, but the ending ruined everything. It was unexpected, and just not good. I literally stood up and screamed "NOOOO" in the theater. Overall, the movie was ok. I would see it again. No blood, except for once when a little girl throws up blood, no bad words, the woman IS very scary, scenes are thrilling and keep you on the edge of your seat with your eyes covered, and there are scenes of dead children. Good, but not great.
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
GREAT!
it has violence, but a good movie, well, it is great! i think it has some scary moments but it is GREAT! i think mature ten year old are ok to see this. dont take younger.
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
Great for teens!
I just recently turned 13 and went to see this with two of my friends alone. I was very well-made and was a thriller rather than horror. This was my first scary movie and I was delighted with the fact it made me jump, but not release a blood-curdling scream in the theature. I would recommend seeing it with an adult or group with mature 13 year olds at the least.
Was this review useful?
|
|
AGE
Genuine scares in this one
Would people rush out to see "Woman in Black" if it starred anyone but Harry Potter himself? Of course not. The movie will definitely scare you, nothing nightmare-inducing however. The theater I was in really got into the story, and Radcliffe gives a solid post-Potter performance as a brooding English gentleman who just can't stay out of a haunted house. The film uses jump-cuts a lot, such as a bird flying into the house. Altogether an OK movie and really good by February-movie standards.
Was this review useful?
|
|
| Topics: | book characters, monsters, ghosts, and vampires |
| Studio: | Alliance Films |
| Director: | James Watkins |
| Cast: | Ciaran Hinds, Daniel Radcliffe, Janet McTeer |
| Genre: | Horror |
| Run time: | 95 minutes |
| Theatrical release date: | February 3, 2012 |
| DVD release date: | May 22, 2012 |
| MPAA rating: | PG-13 |
| MPAA explanation: | thematic material, violence, and disturbing images |
Review It
Video review
Register now to save reviews and advice articles to your personal lists!
Great alternatives handpicked by our editors
Already seen it? What do you think?
More from Common Sense Media
Top advice and articles
